Two types of logical reasoning, sometimes referred to as inductive and deductive, are often distinguished as well as formal deduction. A conclusion or point derived from a rule of thumb and a premise or pre-condition can be stated in a way that leads to a logical conclusion. The conclusion is the “true”correct” answer to a question. The rest of the logic involves using logic with other types of evidence to support the conclusion.
Inductive reasoning involves inferring information from a specific situation or facts. An example of this is when a person has been given a certain piece of information, such as the fact that a certain number of employees are being laid off. To reach a particular conclusion, the information must first be verified. If it proves to be true, then the person will have established a prior “fact.” If, on the other hand, it proves to be false, the information can be ruled out by other factors, such as previous employee layoffs.
Deduction, on the other hand, is a process where the conclusion of the argument is made without having to actually prove the premise. It can be done by reasoning backwards from a particular argument. For example, a person may think about the fact that one of his coworkers has left the company and thus he is left with two options. He could choose to hire someone who will make him more money in order to retain his job, or he could choose to fire him in order to save money. Once he decides to fire him, he has established the fact that it is the best option for him to do so. This is an example of deduction.
In each type of logical conclusion, there are some types of arguments where the premises or pre-conditions that are considered to be true must be true and therefore must be the true conclusion. These premises or pre-conditions can either be axioms, which are true by definition; premises on which an argument is based; or they can be negativities, which indicate that the conclusion is dependent on whether or not other premises are true. that might not be false. necessary, in which case the conclusion is true or false depending on whether or not they are true.
Inductive reasoning is the most common type of logical reasoning used in the natural sciences. It is the process used to arrive at a conclusion using the scientific method of reasoning. Using deductive logic, a person can conclude that a certain number of observations support his conclusion because of a number of observations supported with scientific data.
The second form is deductive reasoning, where a person can deduce a conclusion from another conclusion that was previously determined. This conclusion, however, is not as conclusive as the previous conclusion. However, it is much less expensive means of reaching a conclusion than an inductive conclusion. The conclusion is more general in nature and is usually supported by a lot of empirical data. This conclusion can be used in conjunction with inductive logic to reach a more definitive and definite conclusion. In order to arrive at a conclusion, both inductive and deductive logic are used.
In the end, logic plays a large role in all aspects of our lives and, in some cases, logical conclusions can prove to be incredibly important. This is why logical reasoning should always be used in all situations. Logic, whether it be inductive deductive or inductive and deductive, is the very foundation of science, mathematics, and technology.
